-
Website
http://www.chelpixie.com/blog -
Original page
http://chelpixie.com/blog/2007/12/01/digging-the-superficial-web/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
cc_chapman
1 comment · 4 points
-
EdRoberts
3 comments · 2 points
-
Kate Brodock
1 comment · 1 points
-
Karen Cardoza (aka MrsB)
4 comments · 1 points
-
Christopher S. Penn
1 comment · 8 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
BatchBook Experts
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
BatchBook Experts
Hard work is hard work. Beauty is beauty. Why is that so hard to accept? When I am looking for a hard worker, I know where to go, when I want to see beauty, well, what's wrong with a place for that too. In all honesty, this site features both and I don't see a problem with it. Of course, I completelyenjoy the feminine form, so I guess that invalidates my intellect on anything because I'm just objectifying and diminishing. Hey, I'm not the hottest guy out there, that's why I do an audio podcast. And I'm ok with that. That's life.
Besides, many of the pictures used on the site are promotional pics, and promo pics are used to highlight physical attributes, not intellectual ones.
Oh yeah, thanks for twittering about this site. I wouldn't have found it otherwise. ;-)
We can try to tell ourselves that beauty doesn't have anything to do with success, but in all honesty it doesn't hurt at least. Sex sells. Many of our jobs involve some sort of convincing/selling, and having the sexuality side down really helps! I know I am personally more effective at communication and business relationships when I look better. It all still comes down to working hard. I know at least one person on there works at least 70 hours a week.
It's not sexist at all. While less trafficked, there is a digatechguy.com as well. I'm actually going to get myself on there later and see if I can beat Larry Ellison.
Why is it wrong to appreciate external AND internal qualities of a person?
If anything I see that page as a page of women that I would love to get to know. That's the type of person I want to be around. Someone that's doing something, making things happen, and looking damn good while doing it. Looking good takes work too!
I know where you're coming from and appreciate your opinion, but I think it's just in fun.
Beauty is not at all hard to accept. It's not the beauty I'm objecting to. It's the sexualization of the girls that *have* worked hard to get where they are and they deserve to be recognized for THOSE accomplishments.
I'm glad you don't see a problem with it, but I do. I see a huge problem with celebrating women for the way they look rather than what they've done.
No objectification here. I think they are all beautiful women, but, I also think that they've done much more than being beautiful.
David, I really value what you're trying to say here, but I can't see fun in this really. I summed up my thoughts at Julia's blog (http://clipper.typepad.com/juliapatriciaroy/200...) but I'll say it again. I don't think it's a beauty contest, but I do think there's a lot better value in a) not judging at all and b) celebrating what someone has accomplished.
That is the frustrating point here, guys.
At the same time, I have no problem is anyone wants to praise me for anything- even if it objectifies me or has only to do with my looks. Maybe I just like attention and enjoy any praise. All news is good news for me. I can totally see however why people wouldn't want that attention.