Chelpixie.com - Latest Comments in Twitter: One to How Many?

Re: Twitter: One to How Many?

chelpixie — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:21:29 -0000

I'm loving all of the suggestions and comments. There are some really great suggestions.

The biggest thing thus far for me is that once I follow it's hard for me to unfollow someone because I usually find profoundly interesting things from MOST of the people I follow. Now, I have done a mass unfollow in one setting and turned off some people that I didn't have a real conversation with. I had to because it was important to me to hear the people that I do have conversations going with.

Ged, that's it exactly. It's an overload, which isn't USEFUL to anyone. Not to those I follow or those I read. The issue though to me, is that while Twitter didn't expect to get this big, having a way to organize information and staying organized from the start is the BEST way to start any venture. I wish that they could give us something to tag users with.

This really isn't about popularity to me. I genuinely like reading those I am following.

Jeff -
I would agree with you but I'm seeing some folks use Twitter for more important communications and assuming that I am reading. I'm not always, especially when traveling. You have to DM me to get my attention if I'm away from my computer.

Lori, Daniel,
I think those systems are great, but a lot of work that I don't have a lot of time to follow. I love Twhirl. I don't love missing tweets. I need something reliable and at this point it looks like unfollowing is the only way to partly ensure that.

Creating two accounts with two different clients running to keep up with the accounts takes up more of my time rather than less and it uses Twitter's servers lots more.

Especially I'm liking Ann's approach, but I definitely need to come to terms with the solution Daniel mentioned. My mileage varies from other's.

This is what it boils down to for each of us, isn't it?.

Michael, I agree, there are some problems with Twitter and I just hope that they can resolve them so that some point in the future I can follow everyone I want in a way that doesn't subtract from participating.

Re: Twitter: One to How Many?

Daniel Johnson, Jr. — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:30:15 -0000

Twitter was essentially set up to provide only status updates to close friends, mainly via text msgs.

Over the past 1-1/2 years people have been using it for much more than that.

It sure has been interesting to see it evolve.

Re: Twitter: One to How Many?

Michael J Pastor — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:24:38 -0000

A problem with Twitter (and sites likes Facebook) is that they treat everyone the same - all buddies are equal by kind and degree. They're not.

Twitter is basically a broken chat model. Except in chat , the conversation can be segregated into rooms and Twitter and Facebook can't.

The very premise of Twitter is broken.

Re: Twitter: One to How Many?

David Beaudouin — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:51:26 -0000

Hey Chel:

Good question, and no easy answer. My attention buffer fills quickly, so I take a "week at the beach" approach--jump in 2-3 times a day for refreshment. If I'm interested in a certain thread I'll backtrack it. Otherwise, I leave it to the Fates that important stuff will be sticky enough to get on my radar--how's that for a mixed metaphor! x/D.

Re: Twitter: One to How Many?

AnnOhio — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:23:02 -0000

I have found that the optimum number for me of people to follow is 200. I let my list get up to 300+ and found I was missing the tweets of the people that I really enjoy following. My motto is if you're not adding to my life I'm subtracting you. When the numbers start creeping up I take a look at what each of the people on my list add to my experience and then *quietly* remove people from my list.

If there is a friend I am worried about I may click on their page to see if things are better or if the wheels have fallen off and then send and encouraging DM.

Re: Twitter: One to How Many?

Daniel Johnson, Jr. — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:17:58 -0000

I usually drop in to Twitter via Twhirl or the website to see what's going on at that particular moment in time.

I use TwitterMail to catch replies, and I have GoogleTalk IM set up to receive direct messages. I also have direct messages emailed to me.

All email related to Twitter passes through a GMail filter, skipping the Inbox, and labeled with something like "Twitter" or "bacn".

I subscribe to a couple of RSS feeds via Terraminds.com, Twitterwhere, and - maybe (can't remember) - Yahoo! Pipes.

I set up keyword tracking on Twitter, but it only appears to be working if you have phone notifications on.

It works for me for now. As always, your use of social media may vary, and that's okay.

Re: Twitter: One to How Many?

Kyle — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:16:12 -0000

I've definitely been there and I had to make the decision that Twitter (for me) was a place to hear from my professional network and what they are up to and at the same time I've also decided to cap the amount of folks I'm following to between 280-300.

I did a major 'cleanse' a month or so ago and it has seemed to help me focus my Twitter stream and get what I want out of Twitter.

/kff

Re: Twitter: One to How Many?

Lori — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:23:17 -0000

What Ged said: "Whenever someone starts following me, I check their twitter page via the notification. If they have a website, I also check that out. If they have similar interests, or have similar sensibilities then I add them as a friend to follow. Otherwise, I just leave them be."

I'm probably a little more generous than he (I certainly don't have a cap at 100) but I only add those I find really interesting. And, I only get notifications on some of them.

...and I'm using Tweet bar to keep up with my business Twitter account and Meebo IM to keep up with my personal one.

Re: Twitter: One to How Many?

Jeff Barr — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:51:36 -0000

You have to think of Tweets as little notes floating down a fast-moving river. You are going to be able to catch and to read some of them but many others will just flow by unread. Anything truly important will probably reach you via one or more other channels anyway.

Re: Twitter: One to How Many?

Ged Maheux — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:43:15 -0000

Whenever someone starts following you, there is a temptation to follow them back. This leads to friend bloat and tweet overload. I try to stay at around 100 or so followers. That number is manageable for the most part.

Whenever someone starts following me, I check their twitter page via the notification. If they have a website, I also check that out. If they have similar interests, or have similar sensibilities then I add them as a friend to follow. Otherwise, I just leave them be.

Of the 100 people I follow, only about 30-40 tweet daily or semi daily, so I don't get overloaded with information. This really is the way to go. Anyone like iJustine that is following 3000+ people is just doing it as a popularity contest. You might as well follow the public feed. There's just no point.

Re: Twitter: One to How Many?

Ed Roberts — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:44:54 -0000

I have been very much in the same boat. Twirl checks every two minutes, and I seem to have 6 new tweets to read EVERY time. It's so easy to get social media-induced attention deficit disorder. Like you, I've dropped a few people.

I've also taken advantage of the RSS feed for people I want to follow the most. That way, I can do a quick sweep of their tweets at another time if I want to make sure I don't miss something. That too, can be more of a bulk-delete thing, but it affords me the opportunity to quickly catch up if I want to.